Share This

Showing posts with label Illegal Activities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Illegal Activities. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Is your tenant a criminal?

 

Click To Enlarge)


KUALA LUMPUR: Property owners will have to be much more careful about who they rent to, following the announcement last week that the police will hold landlords responsible for crimes committed on their premises.

To help, the police have identified several red flags which owners should look out for when putting their premises up for rent.

“Be wary of those who pay large sums for advance payments and deposits,” Comm Datuk Seri Ramli Mohamed Yoosuf told The Star.

“Criminals, especially scammers, have paid up to six, or even 10 months’ rent in advance for condominium units. In some cases, there are scammers who purchase properties in cash.”

The Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department (CCID) director said landlords, joint management bodies (JMB) of high rises, and security companies should also watch out for large groups of people staying in one property.

“If a condominium unit has 20 to 30 people staying there and they are rarely seen, that is deemed suspicious,” he said.

“Frequent changes in occupants will also occur, as well as ordering food from ehailing services and having lookouts posted in the lobby in case the authorities raid the premises.

“These are the telltale signs of premises being used by criminals, especially scam syndicates.”

ALSO NREAD: Experts: Focus on criminals, don’t ‘victimise’ landlords

He added that landlords, JMBs, and security companies can no longer claim ignorance if criminal activities occur on their properties or, in the case of security companies, on premises they have been hired to guard.

“We are really serious about focusing on holding such parties liable if criminal activities, especially scam call centres, occur on their properties.

“As I mentioned previously, we will take action against them under Section 120B of the Penal Code for criminal conspiracy. No longer are actions solely focused on syndicate members,” he said.

In this context, Comm Ramli said the CCID is also proposing amendments for Section 108 of the Penal Code for abetment (aiding an offender committing a crime).

(Click To Enlarge)(Click To Enlarge)

“While we can still take action under existing laws, the proposed amendments will give the police more jurisdictive power to further investigate owners of premises in connection with illegal activities occurring on their properties.

“We will also propose heavier penalties, including forfeiture of properties. We expect to submit the proposals to the Home Min­ister soon,” he said.

Following major crackdowns in Myanmar and Cambodia, scam syndicates are beginning to shift their call centres to other countries, including Malaysia.

This is why holding property owners, as well as security companies and JMBs, liable is vital, Comm Ramli said.

“Using the relevant laws will be a form of deterrent, making the three parties accountable, and in turn, reducing the number of scam call centres in the country,” he said.

ALSO READ: Urgent need for long-awaited residential tenancy law

Universiti Sains Malaysia criminologist Datuk Dr P. Sundra­moorthy said landlords have various methods to evaluate whether potential tenants might pose a risk during the tenancy period.

“Landlords can implement evaluation thorough screening procedures, such as conducting background checks and verifying employment and rental history,” he added.

Sundramoorthy said landlords can also check references from previous landlords.

They should also assess the tenant’s financial stability and observe their behaviour and interactions, he said.

In addition, being vigilant about local crime patterns and staying informed through community reports can help landlords identify potential risks too.

The senior criminologist said homeowners and landlords can take proactive measures such as installing security cameras, good lighting and secure entry systems.

“They can also foster a sense of community among tenants by encouraging communication and reporting suspicious activity,” he said.

Malaysians Against Rape, Assault and Snatch Theft (Marah) founder Dave Avran concurred with Sundramoorthy, saying that landlords have a duty to conduct proper background checks and ensure their properties aren’t being used for illegal purposes.

“Too often, scammers set up operations in rented homes or office spaces with little to no oversight.

“If landlords faced penalties, they would be more cautious about whom they rent to, thus reducing the likelihood of such incidents,” he said.

In some cases, property owners knowingly turn a blind eye, he added.

“Critics point to landlords who ignore red flags like tenants paying in cash, frequently changing occupants, or restricting access to parts of the property,” he said.


Urgent need for long-awaited residential tenancy law


PETALING JAYA: Following the announcement last week by the police that they could hold landlords responsible for illegal activities carried out on their property, it is now more urgent than ever that the long-awaited Residential Tenancy Act (RTA) be tabled, say stakeholders.

Malaysian Institute of Estate Agents president Tan Kian Aun said the Act should be expedited to address the rising cases of property-related scams, illegal activities, and landlord-tenant disputes.

“We’ve received a lot of complaints, not only from the public but also from real estate agents.

“Landlords are discovering that their units are being used for illegal activities such as online scams, illegal call centres, and even gambling – often only after neighbours complain or the tenants stop paying rent,” he said when contacted.

He shared a case in which a landlord only discovered that his condominium unit had been turned into an illegal call centre when the electricity bill skyrocketed and neighbours complained of suspicious activity.

“The tenant had passed all checks and even paid a six-month deposit. But when they stopped answering calls, we found the place rigged with wiring and computer set-ups, all hidden from plain view.

“Most landlords only realise what’s happening when the rent stops coming in or the police knock on their door,” he said.

Kian Aun said one essential provision of the proposed RTA should be to grant landlords the right to inspect their properties.

“You cannot put all of the blame on landlords. But landlords must also take responsibility.

“If we allow inspections, at least the owner or their agent can verify that the unit is being used properly,” Kian Aun said.

Housing and Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming recently said the ministry is still drafting the RTA, which aims to regulate landlord-tenant relationships and ensure that both parties are given their rights and fulfil their obligations throughout the tenancy.

Senior lawyer Marcus Tan Kian Han, managing partner of Marcus Tan & Co, said property owners and joint management bodies (JMBs) should not be held fully accountable for illegal activities carried out by tenants unless there are clear laws or regulations in place.

“Whether it is fair and reasonable to impose such duties and obligations on property owners and JMBs depends on whether there are existing laws or regulations which, at the moment, there are none,” he said.

“In the absence of legislation requiring property owners to take such measures, it may not be truly fair and reasonable. It becomes more of a matter of common sense rather than a legal duty.”

In the absence of clear laws, Marcus suggested that property owners take proactive measures to protect themselves, such as verifying and keeping copies of tenants’ identification documents like identity cards, passports, or company registration papers.

He said owners should conduct background checks using available databases like the Credit Tip-Off Service or insolvency portals, and even conduct basic online searches to identify any possible red flags.

He also advised owners to seek tenants’ written consent to carry out comprehensive background searches that could reveal litigation history, and to include a clause in tenancy agreements that allows owners to inspect the property under reasonable notice, as well as indemnity clauses to protect themselves.

Marcus recommended that owners engage solicitors to draft stronger tenancy agreements and to use professional tools such as Handshake or public databases, including sanctions or wanted lists, to perform deeper checks on potential tenants.

He said JMBs should require landlords to submit copies of tenants’ identity documents and tenancy agreements for record-keeping and security purposes.

He added that JMBs should immediately notify landlords if security guards detect any suspicious or illegal activities, and they should pay attention to tenants who share access cards or to visitors not listed in the records provided by the landlord.

He said that without clear policies or regulations, both property owners and JMBs remain vulnerable to being implicated in criminal activities carried out by tenants and that firm guidelines are necessary to provide clarity and protection for all parties involved.


Related stories:


Friday, July 12, 2024

Clamping down on mule accounts;' Onus is on banks to prove unauthorised transactions'

 Law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said said losses from online fraud crimes over the past three years totalled more than RM2.65 billion.

PROPOSED amendments to the law were tabled in Dewan Rakyat with the aim of clamping down on the use of mule accounts for illegal activities. 

The move is seen as a measure to address the alarming rise in online financial fraud cases.

Those convicted under the new offences could face fines of up to RM150,000 and 10 years in jail.

The Penal Code (Amendment) Bill 2024 and Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Bill 2024, which were tabled for the first reading by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reforms) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, will also see stiff penalties being imposed against those involved in such activities.

Under the amendments, several new sections – 424A, 424B, 424C and 424D – were included under the Penal Code for offences related to payment instruments or accounts at financial institutions.

“The proposed new section 424A seeks to provide for the offence and penalty for possession or control of any payment instrument of another person or any account of another person at a financial institution without lawful authority or lawful purpose,” the Bill read.

Those found guilty could face a fine of between RM5,000 and RM50,000, imprisonment of between six months and five years, or both upon conviction.

The proposed new section 424B states the offence and penalty for allowing another person to control or possess payment instruments or an account at a financial institution without lawful authority or purpose.

This offences is punishable by a fine of between RM10,000 and RM100,000, a prison term of one to seven years, or both upon conviction.

Under subsection 424C(1), individuals who directly or indirectly engage in transactions using their payment instruments or accounts for unlawful purposes can be punished with a prison term of three to 10 years or a fine of between RM10,000 and RM150,000 or both.

As for unlawful transactions conducted using another person’s payment instruments or account, Section 424C(1) states that those guilty could be fined between RM10,000 and RM150,000 or face a prison term of between three and 10 years or both.

The financial institutions under the proposed laws refer to licensed banks under the Financial Services Act, licensed Islamic Banks under the Islamic Financial Services Act and the institutions prescribed under the Development Financial Institutions Act with payment instruments also designated by the respective Acts.

A new section, 116D, was also proposed under the Criminal Procedure Code, which would empower a police officer not below the rank of sergeant to seize or prohibit dealings involving money held or suspected to be held in any payment instrument or account at financial institutions.

The police officer can act if they have reasonable cause to suspect that an offence has been committed if the money has been used or is intended to be used to commit an offence or if the money constitutes evidence of an offence.

The second reading is scheduled for the current Dewan Rakyat meeting.

According to data from the Legal Affairs Division, there were a total of 266,230 reports on mule accounts while 146,772 bank accounts were identified as mule accounts.

Source link

'Onus is on banks to prove unauthorised transactions' 


The burden to conduct a detailed probe to prove any unauthorised banking transaction lies with the banks and not the victim of financial scams, say. The burden to conduct a detailed probe to prove any unauthorised banking transaction lies with the banks s Lim Hui Ying and not the victim of financial scams, says Lim Hui Ying.

Clamping down on mule accounts;' Onus is on banks to prove unauthorised transactions' said this in response to a question from Chong Chieng Jen (Pakatan Harapan-Stampin) during Question Time in the Dewan Rakyat on Tuesday (July 9).

“Scam victims do not need to prove that the transaction is real. That is for the bank to prove,” said the Deputy Finance Minister in response to a question from Chong Chieng Jen (PH-Stampin) during Question and Answer Time.Chong asked the Finance Ministry to state whether it had any intention to amend existing laws so that banks were held responsible for the full or partial losses suffered by victims of financial fraud or scams.

Lim said quantum of compensation by the banks would take into consideration the outcome of investigations of each case and the effectiveness of the security controls implemented by the banks to address financial fraud.

“If the financial loss is solely due to the negligence and weaknesses of the bank, then the bank must be fully responsible for the loss,” she added.

She said if the scam victim disagreed with the bank’s decision and compensation offer, the account holder had the right to take the matter up with the Ombudsman for Financial Services.Besides this, Lim said banks had implemented several measures since June 2023 to safeguard account holders, including ensuring that every banking transaction complies with security features such as confirmation of transactions with clients, providing transaction notifications to clients and strengthening fraud detection rules to identify suspicious transactions.


Related:

What is a Mule Account Scam? Your bank account is being used by others to either collect or transfer funds. These funds could be stolen or laundered from ...