Share This

Sunday, July 16, 2023

The economics of the sport of golf, a game of patience as well as strategy

 

MST Golf's is a one-of-a-kind listing and therefore would enjoy a scarcity premium.

 


 

THERE is a joke in the golfing community, ask a man to wake up before sunrise, there will be a million excuses.

Ask a man to tee off at dawn, he will be right on time. In the years I have played the game, I have witnessed the laziest people putting the utmost effort into improving their golf swing.

The amount of money spent on equipment, coaching, practice rounds in the driving range, club membership fees, travel and flight expenses to overseas golfing trips is mind-boggling.

This sport is by no means cheap and compared to other equipment sports like ping pong, it is incomparable.

However, once you start the game, you will be hooked for life. Every single round of golf is different.

The experience of playing with different people and courses makes it even more interesting.

So, what has all this got to do with business or the stock market?

Well, we have a highly anticipated

Main Market initial public offering (IPO) coming soon, which is the MST Golf Group Bhd listing.

For those who play the game, MST is a household name for golfers. It has been around for as long as I was born.

Over the years, MST has grown from a single retail store to controlling more than 51% of the local golf equipment retail and distribution market in Malaysia.

It is also the second largest golf retailer in Singapore. Although some older establishments such as RGT Golf, Desa Golf House, Transview Golf and others still exist in the market, none of them have seen the growth rate and expansion the way MST has done through the years.

A game of passion


Golf as a sport has been growing tremendously in the past century since its founding in Scotland in the 1860s. Today, there are over 80 million golfers and 30,000 golf courses globally.

The United States, Japan and South Korea are the top three countries which dominate global golf participation.

Based on the World Golf Report 2023 data, worldwide golf equipment and apparel market hit Us$20bil (Rm93bil) in 2022 of which Us$11.1bil (Rm51bil) was in equipment sales and Us$8.9bil (Rm41bil) in apparel sales.

There was also a major surge in worldwide sales in 2021 with an annual increase of more than Us$5bil (Rm23bil).

The sport is so popular that a seismic change in the golfing landscape occurred in 2022 when a new professional golf tour funded by the Public Investment Fund (sovereign wealth fund of Saudi Arabia) known as LIV Golf started and challenged the historic PGA Tour.

The prize fund up for grabs for a single season tournament reached a staggering Us$400mil (Rm1.8bil). Top-ranked golfers were offered hundreds of millions just to join LIV.

The PGA Tour reacted by banning professional golfers who played on the LIV golf circuit and multiple legal suits were filed between the two organisations.

Ultimately, a resolution appeared to be in sight following the news that a potential merger will go ahead between the two franchises. A Netflix documentary on golf, called Full Swing, depicts the sport’s evolution.

Golf as a sport has a huge market not only in terms of the annual growth rate of the number of players, but it remains the most lucrative sport in terms of the prize money and sponsorship deals.

We can see the continuous sponsorship of Rolex and other premium brands plastered all over golfing events.

Market leadership


MST’S IPO was oversubscribed by 5.28 times. This is a good performance considering it is a Main Market listing looking to raise Rm130mil for expansion.

At the IPO price of 81 sen, the market cap upon listing is expected to be Rm665mil. This is a rather huge IPO and not comparable to smaller ACE Market listings.

The question on some retail investors’ minds is that recent Main Market listings have been disappointing such as DXN Holdings Bhd, Radium Development Bhd and more recently Skyworld Development Bhd.

Some are concerned that the sentiment may impact this IPO as well. I am of lesser concern because the true value of the company lies not only in which market it lists but also its business itself.

Apart from the clear market leadership position of MST, many from the investment fraternity have used MR DIY as a peer comparison. I have also seen some other commentary using other retailers such as Innature, Senheng, Padini and others which are in the consumer retail space.

This led to the misconception that MST is listing at a very steep valuation. MST in fact is a specialty retailer and distributor of equipment for a global sport catering to the segment of consumers with the highest disposable income.

MST is very different from the other above-mentioned consumer retail companies which target the masses.

Furthermore, due to its track record and entrenched market share, we are unlikely to come across another golf equipment retailer and distributor company listing on Bursa Malaysia in the years to come. This is a one-of-a-kind listing and therefore, would enjoy a scarcity premium.

Ideally, I would like to see MST perform as well as MR DIY on listing day and the weeks to come.

However, the distinguishing factor that I believe would see MST sustain and do better for the longer horizon is because the MR DIY listing does not include the businesses in its other foreign markets which it expanded to such as Indonesia and the Philippines, etc.

For MST, the listing of the group includes all markets and MST is only starting to venture into Indonesia and Thailand; both are huge golfing markets by the sheer number of their population, popularity of golf tourism and burgeoning middle class.

A better peer comparison in terms of the valuation for MST would be Us-listed Topgolf Callaway Brand Corp.

It is one of the most popular golf equipment brands with a long history of being golfers’ favourite. Callaway has historically traded at an average forward price earnings (PE) valuation of 31 times. The immediate forward PE valuation is 23 times.

On the premise of the same valuation metrics, the likely intrinsic fair value for MST in 2024 is not too far off from TA Research’s recent report.

I often likened investing in the stock market to playing the game of golf. It is a game of patience, prudence and strategy.

A lot of practice and dedication is required to be good at the game.

Additionally, this is one sport where the biggest competitor is yourself and not your opponents. Consistency is the key, and one swallow does not make a summer. It is a long game.

Investing in the right company within a short span of time is meaningless if you cannot maintain the performance over a long duration of time.

Ultimately, the one who is regarded as a good investor, like a good golfer, is someone who consistently beats the market and surpasses their own performance over a long duration.

Golf is one sport that has a long-life span. It is a game that one can play until a ripe old age. Unlike badminton, football or basketball, the cardio element and companion requirements limit the longevity of the sport.

If your elderly parents are still insisting on playing badminton on a regular basis at the age of 70 and above, I would recommend you asking them to slow down.

Golf, on the other hand, would be one that requires little concern. If anything, the long outdoor session followed by the after-game chit chat session bodes well for the elderly who enjoy companionship.

Now, for those who have subscribed to the MST Golf IPO or are planning to invest on “Gong” day, I hope my article is able to shed some light on the economics of golf both for the uninitiated and for those who enjoy the game as much as I do.

But I must put forth a disclaimer; as an avid golfer myself, my views may be coloured by an inherent bias and lack the objectivity required for a fund manager.

Whether my love for the game would help with my investment or otherwise, we shall find out on July 20.

My best wishes to all fellow golfing aficionados, hopefully we can all reap the rewards of the long game. In the event this IPO goes out of bounds at tee off, we can always try asking Bursa for a Mulligan. 

The Star - StarBiz
Ng zhu hann
 

Related posts:

Penang Golf Club

 

Golf, a good walking game!

Make it a good walk  

Golf is an enjoyable sport as long as there is an element of

 

 Schoolboy shines in history as youngest golf Masters

exercise involved, like walking, otherwise it’s just a parlour game.

BJCC Golf Club management Fiasco: challenges members to leave! Would Guan Eng Intervene?

Golfers pleads Guan Eng to intervene Bukit Jambul Country Club fiasco

BJCC management fiasco: 'Outsourcing not the fair way', Golf truly a walking game!

 

Not all golf clubs adhere to buggy policy 

 

12-year-old Ye Wocheng set to smash age record in golf

 

Not all golf clubs adhere to buggy policy 

 

https://youtu.be/9cGeDbIHX3E

Friday, July 14, 2023

Monthly budget cost of living estimates

CLICK TO ENLARGE 

CLICK TO ENLARGE


https://clips.thestar.com.my/Interactive/main/Belanjawanku_KlangValley.mp4

 


PETALING JAYA: Discussions on the cost of living in urban areas are getting many Malaysians all worked up this week following the publication of an official guide on how much families should pay for their monthly groceries.

On July 12, netizens debated whether an infographic publicised by the Community Communications Department was realistic as it stated a family of four would only need RM391 per month for groceries, with items on the list including rice, chicken, bread, eggs, cooking oil and cooking gas.

According to another budgeting guide for Malaysians put forth by the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), a single person in the Klang Valley would require a monthly budget of between RM1,930 and RM2,600 to survive, whereas a married couple without children would require RM4,630, those who have a child would require RM5,980, and those who have two children will require RM6,890. 


The guide suggests that singles should allocate RM610 for their monthly grocery budget while married couples without children should plan to spend RM960 on food each month.

For couples with one child, the monthly allocation for food should be RM1,420 while those with two children can cap it at RM1,690.

EPF stated that these were merely guides to assist their contributors in budgeting wisely, in accordance with their locations.

Checks on the ground showed that many income earners are trying to stretch the ringgit by buying cheaper meats such as chicken instead of seafood and shopping at cheaper places.

For mother of four Norlaili Aryati, 48, who lives at the Intan Baiduri People’s Housing Project (PPR) in Kuala Lumpur, the Community Communications Department’s suggestion of RM391 would barely cover essential food items for her household.“My household would need about 10 chickens per month as the children do not like to eat fish, and chicken is also cheaper than fish. One chicken can be priced at RM20.

“Just the food – both wet and dry items – would easily come to about RM1,000. My household income is now RM5,000 as three of my children are working and only one is still schooling,” said Norlaili, who makes a living babysitting for her neighbours.

She said that her grocery bill is her largest expense, so she has decided to reduce her spending on school transport and instead rely on the free bus services offered by the Kuala Lumpur City Council.

Lower middle income earner and portal sub-editor Khayrana Pilus, 49, from Seremban, said that eggs and chicken are her mainstay for her household with four children.

Khayrana, whose household income is about RM7,000, said at least two chickens are consumed in her house every week.

“I do not cook much vegetables as the children would not eat them, and it would just be for me and my husband. I would buy milk and cereal on pay day.

“I don’t buy cheese or butter, as they are too expensive. RM1,000 is what I spend on food every month. Luckily, I work from home, and this allows me to cook and skip eating out,” said Khayrana.

Housewife and mother of three, Prema Pekasam, 52, of Petaling Jaya, said she still watches her bills even though her household income may be in the top tier.

She said that her children, aged between 17 and 23, are still studying, and much of her household income goes for their education.

“I make sure that my grocery bill does not exceed RM2,000 every month. I cook almost every day as my children, even though they are in their early 20s, still bring packed lunches to college.

“Fresh items and groceries alone would come to between RM1,300 and RM1,500. My family also consumes about 15kg of rice a month.

“I go to wholesale marts such as NSK to buy my chicken as it is cheaper there. While supermarkets elsewhere may sell chickens for RM11 or more per kg, it is only RM8 per kg at these wholesale outlets.

“Every month, I would buy four whole chickens and also chicken parts. A supermarket trip would cost me about RM300 for a full trolley,” said Prema. Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience! 

Source link

 Related posts

Malaysian Budget 2023 revised up to RM388.1bil, GDP to grow 4.5% in 2023 from the expanded 8.7% in 2022

 

Malaysia's low wages: low-skilled, low productivity, low quality, reliance on cheap foreign workers! Need to manage!

Janet Yellen's visit to China: the world has not changed, what has changed is China. China has become stronger

 


Let Yellen yell all she wants but China just humbly listen and then says it needs to clear off a big chunk of Us OLD Treasuries debt first, only then will consider to buy new ones. However buying new Treasuries now will mean supporting their incoming huge military budget which is really a big security threat to world peace



This is how Yellen negotiated with China. She proposed to cancel the additional tariffs imposed during the Trump era, but requires China to meet the 3 following conditions:

1. Buy $850 billion US treasury bonds

2. Withdrawal of China's counter-sanctions (export restrictions of the two rare metals indispensable for the making of high-end chips etc)

3. Pledge not to support Russia.

All these conditions are unilaterally advantageous to the USA. Tariff removal will to some extent advantage China. However given 90% of the cost of the tariffs are borne by US consumers, it will mainly serve to bring down the US inflation. 

Secondly, Yellen wants China to forgive the BRI debts. Thus, the cash flow derived from the infrastructure projects China financed and built for developing countries will be repurposed to pay back debts of US banks and the IMF. So in the end, everything China had built for the Global South will serve as the collateral when these countries borrow from the US. 

Americans must be very proud of the extremely clever way their politicians has aggressively protected US interests from the position of strength. 

China answered - *NO*

Not surprisingly the US is nostalgic of the era of the eight allies invading China in 1900.  A photo of that shameful event is still hanging on the wall of the US military headquarters and another such photo is on the wall of the US embassy. The US 'sensitivities' obviously doesn't apply to China.  Imagine if on the US embassy walls were hung pictures of their ancestors' slave markets, or their early settlers giving smallpox infested blankets to the American natives. 

In 1900, China was as helpless as the American Indians when they were facing European invaders. The westerners had advanced weapons, forcing China into total submission within months from the start of any war with them. 

China subsequently were forced to sign the unequal treaties, such as the Boxer Protocol, one of the many unequal treaties that marked China's one hundred years of humiliation, having to hand over war compensation of 18,000 tons of silver to these invaders. Lands and ports were turned over as foreign concessions. 

The eight country alliance, (ie, the current G7 plus Russia) carved up China amongst themselves.  The world has not changed, what has changed is China. China has become stronger. This is China's patriotic lesson from these westerners. The historical shame is deeply burnt into the psyche of every Chinese, including those overseas Chinese who still regard themselves as Chinese. 

Yellen invited a group of pro-American feminist economists to dinner. While Pro-Chinese academics in USA are under CIA/FBI surveillance and are frequently thrown in prison and charged for espionage, Yellen is free in China, she can meet anyone she pleases. 

As usual, Yellen told her Chinese guests that the USA government is only against the Chinese government but not against the Chinese people. She seem to suffer from an information lag.  Twenty years ago, many Chinese liberals bought that. Today, Chinese people don't buy that anymore.

Related posts

Who would think that US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is 'kowtowing' to China?

 US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen “Bows” To The Chinese US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen meets with Chinese officials in Beijing, on Jul...

Will US debt ceiling deadlock push capital to yuan market?

 

The Bankrupting of America 

 

Should we be worried about debt?

 

 

Related:

 

China warns NATO against destabilizing Asia-Pacific

The NATO Summit communiqué released on Wednesday mentioned China much more than past summit declarations and accused the China-Russia relationship ...

Who would think that US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is 'kowtowing' to China?

 US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen “Bows” To The Chinese

US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen meets with Chinese officials in Beijing, on July 8, 2023. Photo: VCG

 

The scene of US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen making a courtesy bow during a meeting with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Beijing on Saturday has left some Americans irritated and rankled. Yellen has returned to the US, and these people are still criticizing her, claiming that she seems to be "summoned to the principal's office," and is "kowtowing to China," "showing weakness" and so on. Some former US official even shouted "Never, ever, ever... An American official does not bow." This shows the extent to which American public opinion is allergic to Chinese elements.

When watching Yellen's past videos, it is not difficult to find that this is one of her habitual actions. If it hadn't caused such a strong reaction in American society, few Chinese people would have noticed this detail. The Chinese people would not be so naive as to think that Yellen was "kowtowing" to China. They tend to consider her move as a courteous performance, which will not only objectively add to her personal charm, but also somewhat improve the impression of the US and its officials on Chinese society.

Humility is a respected virtue in China, a country of etiquette, and it is impossible for someone to be criticized for being humble and observant. The opposite of humility is arrogance. Who would like an arrogant person or country? The most prominent feature of some American officials who "never bow" is arrogance.

It can be seen from this unexpected incident that Yellen's humility is only an isolated case in the US, and it cannot represent or change the characteristics and overall style of the US diplomacy and officials. American public opinion's attack on Yellen has drawn back the emotional distance between China and the US that she has narrowed with her personal qualities, and once again proves how narrow the space is for rational decision-making and behavior in the US' China policy.

The hegemony shown in the controversy over the "Yellen bow" video in the American public opinion is precisely the reason why Chinese society is subconsciously wary of Washington. Few Chinese people would naively think that Yellen, who has shown humility, will compromise or be weak during the China-US talks, and the facts have proven this.

The mainstream perception of the US in Chinese society is highly sober, emphasizing reciprocity while also being unwavering on issues of sovereignty, security, and the right to development. Yellen's bowing gesture demonstrated rare goodwill and politeness from a US official, but it was swiftly dispersed by the distorted winds of American public opinion.

The decline of American hegemony first occurs within the minds of some Americans. In today's US, it seems whoever is expressing some friendly gesture to China is seen as kowtowing to China. This is an irrational mentality, stemming from a relative position of psychological weakness, seeking psychological compensation by maintaining a posture of strength. The US remains the world's sole superpower. However, its arrogance, fragility, and sensitivity in dealing with foreign powers, particularly China, are derivatives from its severely damaged confidence in the face of China's rapid development. All countries should draw lessons and experiences from this.

As some Americans were finding it hard to accept that Yellen bowed, another picture of Yellen having a meal with a few young Chinese female economists also sparked controversy on the Chinese internet.

The attendees received criticism from many netizens. It must be said that while the two incidents may seem similar, the situations are different. It is normally common and indisputable for government officials to have meals with local individuals during foreign visits as a form of public diplomacy. However, US officials often exploit this format to intervene and interfere in other countries' internal affairs, which we have to guard against. Some reactions on the Chinese internet reflect the chilling effect caused by the long-term suppression of China by the US, which has influenced Chinese public sentiment toward the US.

It's said before the lunch, Yellen even took out a prepared speech and delivered it, which the US also published afterward. In the speech, she stated that while the US has differences with the Chinese government, these are not disagreements with the Chinese people, which carries an obvious intent to sow discord.

The different reactions in China and the US to these two incidents fully illustrate the complexity and delicacy of the US-China relationship. Ultimately, this stems from the US' flawed perception of China and its unhealthy political ecosystem, which generates strong emotions in both Chinese and American societies, in turn affecting the bilateral relationship and creating a vicious cycle. Correcting this abnormal state depends crucially on whether the US can make substantive adjustments.

Source link

RELATED ARTICLES
 

 Related posts:

US is like 'a mafia boss in his later years': expert at GT annual conference

 Photo: Global Times

 

Monday, July 10, 2023

MACC going after foreign agent in ruckus, who received RM18,000 bring in the Chinese national through KLIA

 MACC hunt agent who 'assists' Chinese tourists held up by Immigration


 

‘Man charged Chinese visitor RM18k’


KUALA LUMPUR: Graft busters are tracking down an individual who is believed to have an acted as an agent or middleman to a Chinese woman whose entry into Malaysia via Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) last month caused a ruckus.

Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki (pic) said the individual is believed to be a foreigner.

Initial investigations revealed that the individual received RM18,000 to bring in the Chinese national through KLIA, and he is not a Malaysian citizen.

“We have already identified the individual and we are tracking him down,” he said when contacted, adding that the MACC was still attempting to ascertain whether the individual was still in the country.

“We obtained the information on the individual based on our initial investigation (into the matter).

“Give us space to investigate the matter thoroughly,” he added.

On June 29, Tourism, Arts and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing caused a stir after he confronted Immigration Department officers at KLIA for detaining a female employee of a China-based media company. 

 Eee post:

KLIA, a corruption gateway?

 
Tiong said he was coming to the rescue of the employee after she was barred from entering Malaysia.

He alleged then that she was being pressured into paying several thousand ringgit in order to enter Malaysia.

The incident led to calls for the department to be investigated over alleged corruption at KLIA.

Besides the MACC, the police are also investigating the matter.

Last Wednesday, Azam said that the statements of 14 individuals had been recorded so far, including that of two Chinese nationals, Tiong, eight Immigration Department officers and several other witnesses.

On Saturday, he also urged the media not to sensationalise the allegations of corruption taking place at the country’s entry points.

Azam made the comment in reference to a news portal’s report claiming that the MACC had found no elements of bribery in its investigation.

“It’s too early to conclude the case, it is the sixth day of investigation.

“There are still witnesses to be called, so we advise the media not to sensationalise the issue by quoting unidentified sources.

“We want a thorough investigation and once completed, we will refer it to the public prosecutor or the Attorney General.

“Then it can be determined if there was an element of bribery or not,” he said.

He added that the MACC would also investigate those involved in handling foreigners issued with Not to Land (NTL) notices. 

 Source link

 

Related posts:

KLIA, a corruption gateway?